<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Laursonian Institute &#187; stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laurieandlewis.com/laurie/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=stuff" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laurieandlewis.com/laurie</link>
	<description>An exercise in thoroughness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Last week is this week</title>
		<link>http://www.laurieandlewis.com/laurie/?p=404</link>
		<comments>http://www.laurieandlewis.com/laurie/?p=404#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurieandlewis.com/laurie/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, blog.  It&#8217;s me.  I&#8217;m sorry I&#8217;m too dumb or surly or tired to write every day like I&#8217;m supposed to.  I do think about you when I&#8217;m off doing other more restful things.  And besides, you know I&#8217;ll always come back.
It&#8217;s the last week of the quarter.  More specifically, tomorrow is the last day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, blog.  It&#8217;s me.  I&#8217;m sorry I&#8217;m too dumb or surly or tired to write every day like I&#8217;m supposed to.  I do think about you when I&#8217;m off doing other more restful things.  And besides, you know I&#8217;ll always come back.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the last week of the quarter.  More specifically, tomorrow is the last day of classes.  This is the one time I sincerely wish I didn&#8217;t have sections on Friday nights.  I&#8217;m not sure how many folks will actually come, though I have a hunch it should be about normal.  I&#8217;ll get a small bump from pre-finals freakouts, but a negative effect for being late on the last day, so all in all, no net change.  I&#8217;m hoping it goes alright&#8230; my lesson plan this week didn&#8217;t go off too well yesterday (good greif, was that only yesterday?) and I haven&#8217;t thought of what I should do to make it more fun.  Reviewing just isn&#8217;t that exciting.  And the other alternative is to talk about historical linguistics, which is also rather unexciting and I don&#8217;t want to bother the students too much with the specifics since they won&#8217;t need to know most of it.</p>
<p>As far as my own classes go, it really doesn&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;re over, though all I have left is to turn in the papers.  They&#8217;ve been consuming so much of my time, it&#8217;s incredible to me to think that I won&#8217;t be seeing any of those familiar faces or places, or be obsessing over any of those topics for the foreseeable future.  Not that I won&#8217;t run into people around the department.  I just have really cherished my theory class, and grown accustomed to needing to be constantly working on my 260 project.  Seems like certainly this must only be a temporary reprieve from work and when the holidays pass we&#8217;ll be back to the same-old.  Except instead, I&#8217;ll be learning about brain scans and semantics and Quechua.  Oh Linguistics, you&#8217;re a charmingly broad field.</p>
<p>I finished my book (Flaubert&#8217;s <em>Sentimental Education</em>) and I&#8217;m at that point in my reading cycle where I need to detox from my old book before I can dive into a new one.  This is awkward around now (bedtime) when I&#8217;m ready to turn off and go curl up in bed, but have no motivation to do so since I&#8217;ve not go anything to entertain myself to sleep with.  I&#8217;m also not sure what the next book should be.  I&#8217;ve got strong candidate in a new Louise Erdrich (new to me, anyway), and the newest W. S. Maugham we bought (<em>Moon and SIxpence</em>) as well as a Vietnam-era war book I picked up on the recommendation of my favorite old English teacher.   It&#8217;s nice to try and balance out the reading regime.  I&#8217;m rather fond of those naturalist/victorian-type writers (Zola, Trollope, Flaubert) but their writing is so absorbing and thourough I can&#8217;t just read them back-to-back.  I require something more modern, or at least with lighter prose to offset them with.</p>
<p>Last night I tried picking up a book someone gave us (<em>The Time Traveller&#8217;s Wife</em>).  I had been hesitant about this one (as about most books people give us) since my tastes aren&#8217;t very Oprahs-book-club-y and I do tend to prefer classics and my small set of more modern writers to the wider wilds of modern literature, but I wasn&#8217;t quite ready to commit to anything else.  I got through the prologue and first section, and I think I&#8217;m ready to put it back on the dust gathering shelf it came from.  There&#8217;s something which I&#8217;m sure is a natural direction for our modern novels to move in (and I&#8217;m certainly no Lit or English major, so what do I know?) but it really doesn&#8217;t satisfy my novelust to read books that sound like screenplays.  The overly chatty, dialogue-driven, sparingly (or conventionally) described just starts getting on my nerves.  Dan Brown&#8217;s novel was like that, and so is <em>The Time Traveller&#8217;s Wife.</em> Why did we go from 0-to-sexy-romp in just a few pages?  Did I need to be titilated to convince me this book is worth reading?  The premise sounds interesting, albeit somewhat cheesy-scifi-y, but the tone of the novel has completely thrown me off.  I understand that it&#8217;s supposed to be realistic and people have sex in real life, I just get annoyed at having to sexualize all the characters in a novel when I&#8217;d rather be reading something else.  Though this really does probably point out more than I&#8217;m some kind of moral conservative who wants people to keep their sexy stuff to themselves than it says about modern prose.  But why read something that doesn&#8217;t please you?</p>
<p>Alright, enough epistolating about literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laurieandlewis.com/laurie/?feed=rss2&amp;p=404</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
